Greg Johnson, Editor in Chief, Counter Currents on ITEL Radio – 11.22.14

Greg Johnson, the Editor in Chief of Counter Currents, appeared on Inside the Eye – Live! on November 22, 2014. The interview was very relaxed as Greg expounded on Counter Currents, “metapolitics”, and potential solutions to a more harmonious future for people of White ethnicity.

Counter Currents – A Solid Platform for the Discussion of Ethnic White Issues


To begin the show, we discussed with Greg the current status of Counter Currents as a web property and a publishing entity. Greg revealed that Counter Currents is down from its peak around the Presidential Election of 2012, but that all in all, Counter Currents is doing well.

Greg revealed that Counter Currents is a legal business entity. It is a publishing company with a core editorial focus on “metapolitics”, or the ideological efforts to create political realities and possibilities. It has approximately 20 books published under the Counter Currents title. A fund raising effort over the Summer resulted in over US$40K in raised funds.

As regards Counter Currents, the web property, Greg revealed that Counter Currents has a core base of about 40K readers and approximately 90K unique visitors per month. Further, in a complaint that is becoming more and more heard, Greg mentioned how it seems as if Counter Currents from time to time “gets Googled”, in a negative sense, meaning that Google appears to throttle back clicks available through search queries.

Greg also revealed that Counter Currents has become self sustaining, allowing Greg to earn his living through the efforts of Counter Currents, and as such, Counter Currents in such a light can only be viewed as a resounding success.

The Totality of “Metapolitics” – The Politics of the Possible


At the core of Counter Currents efforts is the espousing the idea of “metapolitics” in the recognition that politics is the art of what is possible. In this light, we discussed the unique synergy of those who are sympathetic to the thoughts and ideas within the White “ethnic centric” political interests and those who consider themselves “the core” of White ethnic political interests, or “White Nationalists”.

Greg put forward that for White people in general, there is an ongoing effort to destroy the White race in totality, and that there are many causes for this, including loss of habitat, “hybridization”, among other factors.

But at the core of White or European ethnic political action, Greg mentioned that “Whites” fail to take their own side in what is purely a “race war” among all ethnic groups, and that a failure to take one’s own side is a decision to lose in that war. But loss in such a war really means “death”, or a destruction of one’s race.

Worse, Greg reveals the reality that Whites are being naive if they believe that by supporting unbridled immigration and handing over “White institutions” to non Whites who, largely, hate whites, are going to somehow thrive and grow in such conditions.

Hence, where we see that Jews have largely come to control lands where Whites are majorities, the fact that Jews hate Whites is precisely why we see Jewish political agendas that seek to foist unbridled immigration onto lands traditionally people by White people.

Time for the Races to Divorce?


Greg discussed at the length the idea that it is time for Whites to “divorce themselves” from the other races. This is what is at the core of White Nationalism.

What this means is that it is time to begin discussing the reality of creating “White homelands”, which includes areas within the continental United States and Canada. In order to achieve an ethnically homogenous state, one idea put forward by Greg is this idea of “coaxing” people to move through the use of economic incentives.

As Greg described, internal “emigration” occurs all the time due to “economic greed”. When people move from one part of the country in search of economic gain, or move because of loss of economic viability within a certain market due to cost of living issues, etc., these are all forms of mass migrations.

Under these conditions, no one bothers to complain nor worry about the mass emigrations occurring all the time, and through a careful exploiting of such “economic greed”, Greg believes that homogenous homelands can be created relatively painlessly over a 50 year period.

This was a good interview for everyone who is interested in thoughts and philosophies at the leading edge of “White metapolitics”.

You can hear the entire interview here:

ITEL Radio Interview – Greg Johnson – 11.22.14


Inside the Eye Live! for November 22, 2014


The balance of the show included a breakdown of the latest massive storm to hit Buffalo, NY, as well as updates on Vice President Biden’s appearance in Kiev. In hour 2, Denis Rancourt appears to discuss his difficulties in dealing with the Israeli Lobby and his ongoing legal battles to defend the right to freedom of speech on University campuses.

You can hear the entire show here:

ITEL Radio full show – 11.22.14


  • Negentropic

    One thing that annoys me about Johnson is that he claims not to be a Libertarian but some sort of not-clearly-defined conservative but then argues 90% of his case in Libertarian terms and never mentions exactly where he does deem it appropriate to morph into a “conservative” and INITIATE force (and its first cousin fraud or indirect force) rather than defend against it and how he justifies the extortion of taxes? If I give money or time (the same thing in the end) to a member of my family or a friend or so-called ‘closest’ extended family of non-friends, it certainly isn’t because if I don’t, somebody will hit me over the head with a stick and lock me up until I do but because it’s my free choice. “Sprucing up” the United States Constitution should make it parasite-proof and this cannot be done with loose and contradictory principles or hidden protectionist ones behind Libertarian posturing. People can sense when someone is not being sincere and only ‘fronting’ for an agenda.

    Lysander Spooner- No Treason, The Constitution of No Authority

    Lysander Spooner, “Vices Are Not Crimes, A Vindication Of Moral Liberty”

    Whites (however anyone wants to define “whiteness,” the German National Socialists included ALL Iranians as Aryans, although I’m pretty sure few WN’s of today would accept that designation) aren’t becoming “extinct” anymore than Jews or Blacks or Samoans or Japanese or Palestinians are becoming “extinct.” Western European Whites are becoming a MINORITY in their own countries (their own because built on philosophical foundations originally laid down by people of European genetic extraction going back to the ancient Greeks and before, which you can say modern Japan, modern China and modern South Korea are also built on, mixed with their own) due to the legalized INITIATED FORCE of unchecked and deliberately promoted culturally-clashing immigration. White Europeans or the people
    who, according to racialist doctrine, are supposed to be most pre-disposed to accepting the philosophical foundations of Western Civilization laid down by a few of their most brilliant individual genetic forebears are already a minority of the world’s population (8%, if the current stats are to be believed), which means Western Civilization and the ideas behind it are in the process of being made less and less influential (although they cannot be eliminated anymore than can an Arab’s or Chinaman’s or Jew’s desire to fly on an airplane, own an automobile, an I-phone or computerized equipment). This is why it is in the interest of anyone of any race on the planet who appreciates the ideas, products and lifestyles resulting from European civilization in its purer and less-parasite-plundered state to worry about the destruction of the influence of these ideas through the outbreeding of those likely to be the most genetically predisposed to carry on the work of this intergenerational, millennia-old spiritual path.

    Whites should be unbrainwashed and deconditioned from the force of their self-destructive public-opinion which has been subconsciously perverted through propaganda to help in the wanton and CRIMINAL destruction of the best ideas of their own kind through initiated force. They need to not just repeal these laws and tell the asswipes behind them to go screw themselves but most important of all, and without this only branches will be hacked and never root, dismantle and make illegal as the ultimate source of all other force-&-fraud the uber-racket of usury & legalized counterfeiting which funds the bought up control of the
    mass-media brainwashing outlets and their endless PsyOps.

    “To maintain an attitude of mind which could be called scientific in any complete sense, it is of cardinal importance to recognize that belief of affirmations sanctioned by the herd is a normal mechanism of the human mind, and goes on however much such affirmations may be opposed by evidence, that reason cannot enforce belief against herd suggestion, and finally that totally false opinions may appear to the holder of them to possess all the characters of rationally verifiable truth, and may be justified by secondary processes of rationalization which it may be impos-
    sible directly to combat by argument.

    It should be noticed, however, that verifiable truths may acquire the potency of herd suggestion, so that the suggestibility of man does not necessarily or always act against the advancement of knowledge. For example to the student of biology the principles of Darwinism may acquire the force of herd suggestion through being held by the class which he most respects, is most in contact
    with and the class which has therefore acquired suggestionizing power with him. Propositions consistent with these principles will now necessarily be more acceptable to him, whatever the evidence by which they are supported, than they would be to one who had not been exposed to the same influences. The opinion, in fact, may be hazarded that the acceptance of any proposition is invariably the resultant of suggestive influences, whether the proposition be true or false, and that the balance of suggestion is usually on the side of the false, because, education being what it is, the scientific method — the method, that is to say, of experience — has so little chance of acquiring suggestionizing force.”

    — Wilfred Trotter, Instincts of the Herd In Peace & War

    Propaganda by Edward L. Bernays (1928)

Optimization WordPress Plugins & Solutions by W3 EDGE